<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Project Trackr Development Log &#187; Interview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://logbook.projecttrackr.com/category/interview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://logbook.projecttrackr.com</link>
	<description>Building a better web based project management solution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:33:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Interview with Dave Blencowe</title>
		<link>http://logbook.projecttrackr.com/interview/interview-with-dave-blencowe/</link>
		<comments>http://logbook.projecttrackr.com/interview/interview-with-dave-blencowe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Damian Jakusz-Gostomski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Interview]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logbook.projecttrackr.com/?p=310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[



Here is my next interview, this time with a freelance web developer. I would like to thank Dave for taking the time out of his busy schedule to help out. And remember, I&#8217;m always looking for more people to interview, so if you can spare half an hour, then leave a comment at the end [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- 	span {font-weight: bold} 	span.damian {color: #204a87} 	span.dave {color: #cc0000 --></p>
<p>Here is my next interview, this time with a freelance web developer. I would like to thank Dave for taking the time out of his busy schedule to help out. And remember, I&#8217;m always looking for more people to interview, so if you can spare half an hour, then leave a comment at the end and we&#8217;ll sort something out</p>
<p>Dave Blencowe is a Freelance Web Developer from the United Kingdom who has been involved in many projects of varying sizes. You can find his site at <a href="http://www.syntaxmonster.net" mce_href="http://www.syntaxmonster.net">http://www.syntaxmonster.net</a> and can contact him directly on dave@syntaxmonster.net if you have any questions.</p>
<p><img src="http://logbook.projecttrackr.com/wp-includes/js/tinymce/plugins/wordpress/img/trans.gif" mce_src="http://logbook.projecttrackr.com/wp-includes/js/tinymce/plugins/wordpress/img/trans.gif" alt="" class="mceWPmore mceItemNoResize" title="More..."><b><br />
</b></p>
<p>
<mce:style><!--<br />
span {font-weight: bold} 	span.damian {color: #204a87} 	span.dave {color: #cc0000 }<br />
--></mce:style><br />
<style mce_bogus="1"><!--
span {font-weight: bold} 	span.damian {color: #204a87} 	span.dave {color: #cc0000 }
--></style>
</p>
<p><span class="damian">Damian: </span> So what sort of projects do you normally manage? Just websites or other projects as well?<br />
<span class="dave">Dave Blencowe: </span> In the past I have managed other projects such as hardware setups and have previously worked as a project manager, overviewing a project team.<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> In your current role, do you still overlook a team or is it normally just you and the client?<br />
<span class="dave">Dave Blencowe: </span> Normally me and another member of a team working with a client<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> And on the client side, do you just have one point of contact or many?<br />
<span class="dave">Dave Blencowe: </span> Just the one<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Are your clients reasonably tech savvy? Would they be able to use a web based PMS or would they need a simplified interface, such as just email?<br />
<span class="dave">Dave Blencowe: </span> Most of my clients are designers or have jobs in other technology based roles so they would manage to cope with a web based system<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Thats great<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> So how long do most your projects last? Days, weeks or months?<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> And how often do you update the client on the state of the project<br />
<span class="dave">Dave Blencowe: </span> Days or weeks<br />
<span class="dave">Dave Blencowe: </span> It all depends on the client, some panic if they don&#8217;t hear from you daily and others will let you get on with it (User specific status update emails?)<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> So a web based system they could just log into whenever they want to see the latest details would be great?<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> What&#8217;s normally involved in these updates?<br />
<span class="dave">Dave Blencowe: </span> Yes, and standard updates can range from &#8220;Yeah I am working on it&#8221; through to a fully updated task list and timeline.<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Ok<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> So what sort of project methodology do you currently use? Waterfall, iterative or as hoc<br />
<span class="dave">Dave Blencowe: </span> Hmm<br />
<span class="dave">Dave Blencowe: </span> In the past we have tended to resort to the waterfall or spiral methodologies so that we can have some form of prototype up and running asap for the client to look at.<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> So you normally adopt to the clients methodology of choice?<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Although as an aside, iterative is considered best for getting working quality code up and running really fast<br />
<span class="dave">Dave Blencowe: </span> We base our methodology choice on what we think suits the client best, as they usually don&#8217;t know about project management.<br />
<span class="dave">Dave Blencowe: </span> And ok then, I&#8217;ll look in to it ^.^<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> So what PMS do you currently use, is it a proper application designed for project management or some system you&#8217;ve put together yourself?<br />
<span class="dave">Dave Blencowe: </span> Previously we have used Basecamp and Mantis but have found existing PMS&#8217;s are too rigid in how they work or they cost too much to run for the services they provide<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> In what ways where the applications you&#8217;ve used too rigid&#8230; what would you say where the biggest 3 problems with them?<br />
<span class="dave">Dave Blencowe: </span> Forcing you in to a methodology or way fo doing something, or not having the functions needed for the specific project/spec of work and supplying no way to extend their system.<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Ok<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> So I know you where planning on creating a PMS of your own, I&#8217;m assuming this was to overcome some of these limitations you found&#8230; what else can you tell me about this&#8230; any really interesting features you&#8217;d like to share?<br />
<span class="dave">Dave Blencowe: </span> Hmm, we planned to include some advanced design based features on our cms such as Version control integration (both local and remote) and image/file annotation for both client and developer.<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Would you find it usefult to have the financial side built in, or would you rather use a dedicated finance system, perhaps with an API<br />
<span class="dave">Dave Blencowe: </span> Personally I think the financial side of the project should kept seperate and maybe have a plugin. On the other hand it&#8217;s probably important for the PMS to manage the cost of resources for the project such as bricks and mortar for a house.<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> My PMS will be targeted at/initially support web dev projects and other software projects where the main cost is the developer time (we&#8217;ll get onto tracking time later)&#8230; so if there&#8217;s isn&#8217;t the cost of other resources such as bricks and mortar as per your example, you think it would be best to keep it seperate?<br />
<span class="dave">Dave Blencowe: </span> I think it would be best to keep it seperate in that case<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Excellent, make it much simpler on my end then : )<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Now if I could get your thoughts on the main sections of my PMS<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> And if for each section, you could think of 2 things that would be the most important for you to have, and one thing that existing PMSs have you&#8217;d rather not<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> First up, nested projects<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Specifically regarding who should see what, should someone automatically be included in all sub projects etc<br />
<span class="dave">Dave Blencowe: </span> hmm<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Can nested projects only be with a single client or a range of client&#8230; should a project only ever have one client? (Just a few things to consider)<br />
<span class="dave">Dave Blencowe: </span> I think it should be an option on the default project whether permissions should be inherited for the parent project or not.<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Would nested projects even be of much use to you? As your projects tend to last days/weeks, so they might not be the sort of scale that would benefit from it<br />
<span class="dave">Dave Blencowe: </span> No, I was thinking they wouldn&#8217;t<br />
<span class="dave">Dave Blencowe: </span> But maybe cross project viewing<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> you mean so you can link two differant but related projects?<br />
<span class="dave">Dave Blencowe: </span> yes, such as the design of a site and system for the site. May have things like different developers or even different clients. But can still have the option of tasks that span the two, etc<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Thats actually a very good idea : )<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Do you think thats a better way to model it then having a project with 2 sub projects, one for the design and one for the system?<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> As that&#8217;s how I would have thought of doing it<br />
<span class="dave">Dave Blencowe: </span> I&#8217;d say so. It would be more flexible beign able to select what elements of your project you want to share with another one. Can stretch from entire milstones through to single documents then too.<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Good point<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Next up, messages<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> These are designed to be a cetralised method to communicate for everyone<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Couple of things to consider<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Should everyone be able to send messages to the client or just the PM<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Should you get an email every time a message is posted or will this just result in you getting the message twice if you check every day<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Can everyone post a message or just the PM and everyone else replies with comments<br />
<span class="dave">Dave Blencowe: </span> I think it should be managed by roles, and you can pick when you are emailed (daily digest, when it happens or never)<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Should these roles be project specific, global or project specific, but inherited from the global ones by default?<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Should these roles be project specific, global or project specific, but inherited from the global ones by default?<br />
<span class="dave">Dave Blencowe: </span> I think by default the PM should only be able to contact the client or even view details about the client, and then it&#8217;s up to them who they allow access to what portions of the project, such as the client, etdc<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> ok<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Next up, tasks<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Would nested tasks be useful to you?<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> For such a small team as yours, is assigning tasks to someone even useful?<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Once a task is done, do you want to forget about it, or a log of what was done when<br />
<span class="dave">Dave Blencowe: </span> Yeah, assigning tasks is useful to even a small team, and being able to nest them would be a benifit too. Cause then you could have a task such as &#8220;Layout Design&#8221; and then sub tasks such as &#8220;Create PSD&#8221; assigned to the designer, and &#8220;Code Layout&#8221; assigned toa  coder<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Would you find it useful to have a deadline on a task or would you stick to just having dates on milestones<br />
<span class="dave">Dave Blencowe: </span> Deadlines on tasks would be useful<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Would you want the deadline on just the task, or applied to a milestone, and then the task linked to the milestone, or do you think you&#8217;d get too many milestones which would cause clutter<br />
<span class="dave">Dave Blencowe: </span> I think deadlines should be to their task only. From how I look at it milestones are points for you to review progress so creating a milestone for each task would get cumbersome. Especially for large projects<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> (You wouldn&#8217;t actually create the milestone yourself, it would be created for you instead of having a deadline on the task, but it would still show up in the milestone view, which could get very crowded for a large project)<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> And speaking of milestones, they&#8217;re next<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Would you find it useful to have both internal milestones as well as the ones the client sees?<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Would you like the ability to have customer priorities for milestones (and tasks) or would low/medium/high be enough for you<br />
<span class="dave">Dave Blencowe: </span> Yeah, as internal milestones could then be more technical (something the client might not understand) And I think that although things such as tasks and stuff should have priorities Customers shouldn&#8217;t be able to see or edit them.<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Sorry, I meant custom<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> So you could make a priority called &#8220;Would be nice if I find the time&#8221; and give it a value of 1 compared to &#8220;show stopper&#8221; with a value of 100<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> (The numbers would all be relative)<br />
<span class="dave">Dave Blencowe: </span> I think priorities such as Low, Medium and High should be the only ones as people may interpret what custom priorities mean differently which could lead to confusion<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Good point, another benefit is that by only having the preset ones, they can be colour coded and have corresponding icons if needed<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Moving onto tickets<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Do you get a lot of change requests during a project? Are these reviewed formally or just tacked onto the end?<br />
<span class="dave">Dave Blencowe: </span> Most of the time you only tend to get change requests if there has been insufficient communication with the client and what you have created isn&#8217;t actually what they wanted (Doesn&#8217;t matter whos fault it is) which means they aren&#8217;t discovered until the end of the project. But I think a bug tracker module a bit like Mnatis would be useful.<br />
<span class="dave">Dave Blencowe: </span> *mantis<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Yeah, I guess the ticketing system is more for the iterative sort of folk (like me)<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Where the full specification isn&#8217;t known up front<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> I&#8217;ll have a look at th bug tracker part of Mantis and see if it would work well with mine<br />
<span class="dave">Dave Blencowe: </span> Mantis is a bug tracker. Not a PMS<br />
<span class="dave">Dave Blencowe: </span> But bugs don&#8217;t have to be bugs, they can be changes or anything else<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Oh, I thought when you said bug tracker module a bit like Mantis, you where refering to a module within Mantis lol<br />
<span class="dave">Dave Blencowe: </span> I meant a module for your PMS, like a bug tracker system<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> ok<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Next up, file sharing and version control<br />
Just to clarify, version control refers to versioning uploaded documents, not hooked up to a system such as SVN or Git<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Do you often share files with the clients during a project or just at the end? Are these mainly designs?<br />
<span class="dave">Dave Blencowe: </span> Clients and I often exchange several documents. For the moment these are normally designs. But in a PMS I would want to be taking things further, such as proposals, ERDs and stuff like that<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Proposals and ERDs probably won;t change too much for you, but I assume versioning would be useful for you for the designs, especially if tied in with the annotations you talked about earlier<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Proposals and ERDs probably won;t change too much for you, but I assume versioning would be useful for you for the designs, especially if tied in with the annotations you talked about earlier<br />
<span class="dave">Dave Blencowe: </span> Yep, they would.<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> ok<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> The last of the main sections in the PMS is time tracking<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> I&#8217;m thinking of 2 methods of input, the traditional timesheet, or a stopclock<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Where you can start a time on a task, and then stop it once you&#8217;ve finished, and it will log the duration for you<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Thoughts?<br />
<span class="dave">Dave Blencowe: </span> I like the idea of the stop clock<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> 2 things people have mentioed regarding the stopwatch method is what if you close the browser windows (the time is logged server side so it doesn&#8217;t matter) and what if you forget (there would have to be a time out)<br />
<span class="dave">Dave Blencowe: </span> The combination of the two would be good, go for timekeeping on a project and personal level<br />
<span class="dave">Dave Blencowe: </span> You could always build a flex application<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> One concern some people have had of the times is who should see it&#8230; would you want just the PM to see it, or all the team?<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> And should the client see the number of hours?<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> What are your thoughts?<br />
<span class="dave">Dave Blencowe: </span> I think it should be limited to the PM, it&#8217;s then up to them to fill in a timesheet for the project itself that the client can say<br />
<span class="dave">Dave Blencowe: </span> *see<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Yeah, that seems to be what most people think, so it must be right : )<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Thats the end of the main sections, before we move on, anything else you want to add or thing I&#8217;ve missed?<br />
<span class="dave">Dave Blencowe: </span> Not that I can think of<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Ok<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Next up, I ave 3 little features I&#8217;ve come up with that make it a little more unique an hopefully more useful, I&#8217;d like to get your thoughts on them<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Project health &#8211; Aims to be an early warning if a project looks like it might go off track, if you&#8217;re regularly missing milestones, always underestime the time for a task etc<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Automated task prioritisation &#8211; Aims to take the effort of deciding whats important in a given context at a given time for you based on that persons work loads, any ending milestones etc<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> And natural language parsing of tasks, so you can enter a task in a single field and it will know whats the name, description, due date and person assigned to that task<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> What are your thoughts on these?<br />
<span class="dave">Dave Blencowe: </span> I think automated prioritisation should suggest, not action<br />
<span class="dave">Dave Blencowe: </span> Other than that it all sounds good.<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Yeah I planned to let you override its suggestions<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> What level of detail do you need, in both the planning and reporting phase of the project<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Minute, hour or days?<br />
<span class="dave">Dave Blencowe: </span> For which one&#8230; I don&#8217;t think I quite understand?<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Site wide, so if you do anything time related, such as entering time into the time sheet, reporting how long everyone worked, estimating times etc<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Or to think of it a differant way, would you like to see what you have to do on a given day, or on a given time within a given range of hours (such as morning of the 20th December, Call someone) or see exactly when you should do something<br />
<span class="dave">Dave Blencowe: </span> Every fifteen minutes<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> That seems to be what everyone goes for (including me)<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> And onto the last question<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Would you/your clients trust a system you can&#8217;t install on your own server and what would it take for you to switch (think cost of conversion, no just the financial side, but also time and effort to get it all setup)<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> What would make it easier for you to get up and running with a PMS<br />
<span class="dave">Dave Blencowe: </span> I think that I would prefer a non local system as then we would be responsible for maintaining it or providing it&#8217;s services. And for switching over I think it should be able to handle imports from other project managers such as Microsoft projects Gantt charts<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> And you just made me think of another thing to make it easier to setup&#8230; you should be able to upload a zip of files, and they&#8217;d be extracted and stored in your account as individual files<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> Thank you very much for taking the time out for this interview<br />
<span class="damian">Damian: </span> If you come up with anything else you&#8217;d like to say, then either email me or post on the blog</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://logbook.projecttrackr.com/interview/interview-with-dave-blencowe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Summary of interview with Sundeep Reddy</title>
		<link>http://logbook.projecttrackr.com/interview/summary-of-interview-with-sundeep-reddy/</link>
		<comments>http://logbook.projecttrackr.com/interview/summary-of-interview-with-sundeep-reddy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 10:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Damian Jakusz-Gostomski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Interview]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logbook.projecttrackr.com/?p=284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following is a summary of my interview with Sundeep Reddy, a project manager in IBM. I&#8217;d like to thank Sundeep for taking the time to help me with my 3rd year project and helping come up with some good points which I will incorporate into the project. This post will not be a transcipt [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following is a summary of my interview with Sundeep Reddy, a project manager in IBM. I&#8217;d like to thank Sundeep for taking the time to help me with my 3rd year project and helping come up with some good points which I will incorporate into the project. This post will not be a transcipt of the interview, but instead focus on summarising the key points.</p>
<p>I aim to do several more such interviews, so if you&#8217;re a project manager, think your current project management system is slightly lacking, work in web/software and have some ideas or just want to help, then leave a message in the comments and I&#8217;ll get in touch.</p>
<p>And on to the interview&#8230;</p>
<p><span id="more-284"></span></p>
<p><strong>What sort of projects do you normally manage, how many people  and are you the only project manager?</strong></p>
<p>I’m currently managing a fairly large project spanning several years with several smaller related projects. There are 2 project managers on this project, one senior and one junior project manager. The number of people we have on the project varies week to week, but on average, it’s 35 people per week. Some of the workers work remotely.</p>
<p><strong>How often do you review the project? Daily, weekly or just when there&#8217;s a problem? What&#8217;s involved in a &#8216;review&#8217;?</strong></p>
<p>I check the status of the project every day and generate a weekly report as well. This report is primarily for passing up the chain and contains information such as where we are in relation to the plan, the financial situation, any potential risks etc. It’s currently all compiled manually.</p>
<p><strong>Whats the average length of one of your projects, or do they vary a lot? Do you normally have just one big project at a time or lots of smaller projects simultaneously?</strong></p>
<p>There is no such thing as an average project. The large project I’m currently managing has been broken down into a number of sub projects. There are also a number of smaller projects being carried out at the same time, which aren’t part of the main project, but it makes sense to do them at the same time, due to economies of scale. These related projects shouldn’t show up when viewing the main project, but there should be a link to them.</p>
<p><strong>What methodology do you use for your projects? Waterfall or some form of iterative? Is this by choice or company policy?</strong></p>
<p>I use the waterfall model for my projects, as I find it works well for large projects and has proven to be the best in the past. It works well in the time frames I work in, where as agile might be more useful for getting some code out fast.</p>
<p><strong>What project management system do you currently use?</strong></p>
<p>We currently use Microsoft Project as it’s the industry standard. We need something we know will work with everyone else we communicate with, such as our subcontractors. We need to know that they see exactly what we intended, so MS Project is great in this sense, although it does have slightly limited functionality.</p>
<p><strong>What would you say are they key strengths and weaknesses of MS Project? DO you still find yourself doing certain things manually or using external tools?</strong></p>
<p>One thing that’s very difficult to keep on top of with MS project is the commercial aspects of a project. Another potential problem is managing resources, especially ones which span multiple projects/systems/locations.</p>
<p>Another problem we’ve had in the past is resubmitting of time sheets. This skews all our data and wastes more time resolving it, so anything that could prevent that is a bonus. I then take these times and put them into an Excel file to track the finance side of the project.</p>
<p>Essentially, I need to know if we’re on track and if we’ll hit out milestones, so anything which helps achieve this is great.</p>
<p><strong>What are your thoughts on the following areas of the PMS and their relative importance?</strong></p>
<p><strong>Nested projects – </strong>This is a pretty useful, as I said earlier, I have my main project split into several smaller ones, which would become nested projects in your model. It’s nice to also have links to the related side projects, but not have then actually be part of the project.</p>
<p><strong>Messages – </strong>Sounds like a nice feature and it would be good to have all communications consolidated in a single place, but it wouldn’t be all that much use to me. Most of our communication is face to face.</p>
<p><strong>Milestones – </strong>These are pretty important, but if you’re keeping on top of all your tasks, these should just fall in place.</p>
<p><strong>Tasks – </strong>This is probably the most important thing as everyone needs to know what they need to do next. Dependencies would be great too, as then we can see the critical path.</p>
<p><strong>Tickets (after some explanation of what and how they are/work) – </strong>This wouldn’t be of much use to me, as we don’t really get many changes as we use the waterfall methodology. I’m sure this would be very useful for iterative projects though.</p>
<p><strong>File sharing and version control (Used for documents, mock-ups etc, not source code) – </strong>Would be pretty useful to have all documents such as specifications in a central location.</p>
<p><strong>Time tracking – </strong>This is a very important part of any project, but has potential problems as I mentioned earlier with resubmitted timesheets, so anything which would be done to prevent that would be great. Also if the PMS took care of the financial side as well, that would be great, as I currently track these manually in an Excel spreadsheet.</p>
<p><strong>Project health – </strong>Sounds like an interesting idea, and would be nice to get an idea of how all your projects are doing on the dashboard.</p>
<p><strong>What level of control and detail do you need? Minute, hour or day?</strong></p>
<p>Clients don’t like it if we use hour increments, as it can be more expensive for them but in most case they’re fine with 30 minute increments.</p>
<p><strong>In one of my emails, I mentioned 2 features I was thinking of, project health and automated prioritisation. Would you trust a system which attempted to define what was the most important task at any given time or would you prefer to have manual control over this?</strong></p>
<p>This sounds like a good idea, as it may take into account a factor we missed, and if it gets it right it saves doing it manually, but I would need to be able to override it.</p>
<p><strong>Would you trust a system you can&#8217;t install locally?</strong></p>
<p>It depends on what is meant by locally. With some projects, such as government, it can be very difficult to get away with it not being stored on site, and it definitely won’t work if the servers not in the country. Also, you might not have an internet connection at all times, so a local system is sometimes the better option.</p>
<p><strong>Would you take advantage of fine grained user permissions or would you want everyone to see everything?</strong></p>
<p>Leaving everything open can be dangerous. All sorts of people, both internal and external would be accessing the system, and certain information may only be intended for users of a particular band (level). Anything related to financial figures and other confidential information needs to be handled carefully and be hidden from sub contractors.</p>
<p>On the other hand, items such as milestones should be visible to everyone including who’s on the critical path. As you mentioned, time is a sensitive issue and has the potential to make people look bad. If someone is doing a job and then goes off (on holiday) and someone takes over and does 1 weeks worth of work in 2 days because they’re more experienced, it could make the original person look bad.</p>
<p><strong>Most web based systems send out email notifications out whever anything occurs. If you would use the system each day, you would end up receiving the same information twice. Do you think this would be the case for everyone? Thoughts?</strong></p>
<p>If you’re using the PMS regularly, then as you say, the email notifications will just be the same information twice, so you would need to be able to opt out of it. One good idea would be to only send out notifications (such as a text) if an event of a high enough priority occurs. This way, I will be notified immediately, and can then decide how to respond.</p>
<p>I will write up a post how my findings in this interview will impact the project and it&#8217;s features in the next couple of days and link to it from here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://logbook.projecttrackr.com/interview/summary-of-interview-with-sundeep-reddy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
